CIVILIAN, MILITARY PLANNERS HAVE DIFFERENT VIEWS ON NEW APPROACH TO AFGHANISTAN

Washington Post article on the implementation of Obama’s strategy for Afghanistan, which it says is being interpreted differently by civilian and military personnel. If true, it reads like a recipe for disaster. The problem is that the US military has a long tradition of ignoring the civilian politicians…and of maverick generals. Worth pinning on the CIVILIAN, MILITARY PLANNERS HAVE DIFFERENT VIEWS ON NEW APPROACH TO AFGHANISTAN

RUSSIA: SHIFT TO THE SHADOWS

Nice piece in the FT on the role of the silovki under Putin and Medvedev. Turns out to be based on an article in post-Soviet Affairs: “Putin’s Militocracy”, by Olga Kryshtanovskaya and Stephen White. Post-Soviet Affairs 2003, 19, 4

UNEASE AS SECURITY GROUPS TAKE POLICE ROLES

Interesting that this is in the Financial Times, so it must be a business matter. Private security running cells at demonstrations and also getting into investigation work. ACPO untroubled…well, theyre looking for retirement jobs themselves arent they? Lots of retired officers getting into the sector…Could it be that theyre retiring too early???